You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EVALUATION OF ABILITY OF REFERENCE TOXICITY TESTS TO IDENTIFY STRESS IN LABORATORY POPULATIONS OF THE AMPHIPOD HYALELLA AZTECA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, January 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1897/1551-5028(1999)018<0544:eoaort>2.3.co;2 |
| Authors |
Ellen W. McNulty, F. James Dwyer, Mark R. Ellersieck, Eugene I. Greer, Christopher G. Ingersoll, Charles F. Rabeni |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 38% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 25% |
| Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,554,930
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#1,604
of 5,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,675
of 109,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#20
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.