You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Self-efficacy in teaching mathematics and the use of effective pedagogical practices in New Zealand primary schools
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10857-024-09623-9 |
| Authors |
David A. G. Berg, Naomi Ingram, Mustafa Asil, Jenny Ward, Jeffrey K. Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,852,919
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
#58
of 331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,499
of 157,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 331 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them