You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tracing transgenerational plasticity through ova fatty acid biomarkers in Giant Kōkopu (Galaxias argenteus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1080/00288330.2024.2324815 |
| Authors |
Armagan Sabetian, Luu Huong Hoang, Jingjing Zhang, Julian Lilkendey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 33% |
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#15,178,698
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research
#593
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,213
of 194,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.