↓ Skip to main content

β-arrestin-2 is an essential regulator of pancreatic β-cell function under physiological and pathophysiological conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
β-arrestin-2 is an essential regulator of pancreatic β-cell function under physiological and pathophysiological conditions
Published in
Nature Communications, February 2017
DOI 10.1038/ncomms14295
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

β-arrestins are critical signalling molecules that regulate many fundamental physiological functions including the maintenance of euglycemia and peripheral insulin sensitivity. Here we show that inactivation of the β-arrestin-2 gene, barr2, in β-cells of adult mice greatly impairs insulin release and glucose tolerance in mice fed with a calorie-rich diet. Both glucose and KCl-induced insulin secretion and calcium responses were profoundly reduced in β-arrestin-2 (barr2) deficient β-cells. In human β-cells, barr2 knockdown abolished glucose-induced insulin secretion. We also show that the presence of barr2 is essential for proper CAMKII function in β-cells. Importantly, overexpression of barr2 in β-cells greatly ameliorates the metabolic deficits displayed by mice consuming a high-fat diet. Thus, our data identify barr2 as an important regulator of β-cell function, which may serve as a new target to improve β-cell function.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 21 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,045,457
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#39,949
of 47,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,553
of 420,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#755
of 891 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 891 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.