↓ Skip to main content

The Impacts of Nirmatrelvir–Ritonavir on Myocardial Injury and Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 amid the Omicron Wave of the Pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 774)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
53 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Impacts of Nirmatrelvir–Ritonavir on Myocardial Injury and Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 amid the Omicron Wave of the Pandemic
Published in
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, March 2024
DOI 10.1007/s10557-024-07570-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Gu, Zhi-Hua Han, Chang-qian Wang, Jun-feng Zhang

Abstract

Even though nirmatrelvir-ritonavir can improve the short-term morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 patients, the effects of this treatment on long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), especially myocardial injury, remains undetermined. This prospective cohort study identified hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 between April 19, 2022, and June 9, 2022, amid the omicron wave of the pandemic. Matched nirmatrelvir-ritonavir-treated and non-treated cohorts were formed using the propensity score matching method. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of MACEs (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, new-onset heart failure or heart failure hospitalization or ventricular arrhythmia) from 30 days to 16 months after the diagnosis of COVID-19. Two 949-patient cohorts with balanced baseline characteristics were formed by propensity score matching. Patients with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, compared to those untreated, had a lower level of troponin I peak as well as the incidence of troponin I elevation. During the follow-up period, 59 patients in the nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group and 86 patients in the control group developed MACEs (P = 0.020). Regarding specific constituents of MACEs, the differences are mainly reflected in new-onset heart failure or heart failure hospitalization. COVID-19 clinical severity and troponin I peak were the independent predictors, while nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was the independent protective factor for the occurrence of MACEs in this population. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was effective in reducing myocardial injury as well as long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 amid the omicron wave of the pandemic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,087,191
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
#13
of 774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,559
of 304,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them