↓ Skip to main content

Raters’ scoring process in assessment of interpreting: an empirical study based on eye tracking and retrospective verbalisation

Overview of attention for article published in The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 130)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Raters’ scoring process in assessment of interpreting: an empirical study based on eye tracking and retrospective verbalisation
Published in
The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, March 2024
DOI 10.1080/1750399x.2024.2326400
Authors

Chao Han, Binghan Zheng, Mingqing Xie, Shirong Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,066,523
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from The Interpreter and Translator Trainer
#47
of 130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,029
of 157,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Interpreter and Translator Trainer
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them