You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An audit and analysis of electro convulsive therapy patient information sheets used in local health districts in New South Wales Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/inm.13318 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timothy Wand, Sophie Isobel, Holly Kemp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 13 | 23% |
| United States | 7 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 31 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 71% |
| Scientists | 10 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,255,744
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
#93
of 1,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,347
of 316,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.