↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of pathological changes in the olfactory system of mice exposed to methylmercury

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of pathological changes in the olfactory system of mice exposed to methylmercury
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, February 2024
DOI 10.1007/s00204-024-03682-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuta Iijima, Ryohei Miki, Nobumasa Takasugi, Masatake Fujimura, Takashi Uehara

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,559,463
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#98
of 2,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,049
of 240,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.