You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On the ρ-Caputo Impulsive p-Laplacian Boundary Problem: An Existence Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12346-024-00989-y |
| Authors |
Farid Chabane, Maamar Benbachir, Sina Etemad, Shahram Rezapour, İbrahim Avcı |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cyprus | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,363,133
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems
#18
of 48 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,355
of 157,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one scored the same or higher as 30 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them