| Title |
Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the iPhone™ to measure cervical range of motion in healthy participants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-10-69 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme, Nicolas Boutin, Alexandre M Dion, Carol-Anne Vallée |
| Abstract |
Recent smartphones, such as the iPhone, are often equipped with an accelerometer and magnetometer, which, through software applications, can perform various inclinometric functions. Although these applications are intended for recreational use, they have the potential to measure and quantify range of motion. The purpose of this study was to estimate the intra and inter-rater reliability as well as the criterion validity of the clinometer and compass applications of the iPhone in the assessment cervical range of motion in healthy participants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 239 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 23% |
| Unknown | 41 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 23% |
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 54 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2015.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#811
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,792
of 206,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.