↓ Skip to main content

Use of an ion-exchange adduct of synthetic hectorite and chiral copper(II) complex as a packing material for chromatographic resolution

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Clay Science, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 732)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of an ion-exchange adduct of synthetic hectorite and chiral copper(II) complex as a packing material for chromatographic resolution
Published in
Applied Clay Science, April 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.clay.2024.107290
Authors

Akihiko Yamagishi, Kenji Tamura, Masumi Kamon, Jun Yoshida, Hisako Sato

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,263,326
of 25,517,918 outputs
Outputs from Applied Clay Science
#8
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,157
of 106,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Clay Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,517,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them