You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prognostic Significance of Central Skull Base Remodeling in Chiari II Malformation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a8142 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John T Freiling, Nilesh K Desai, Stephen F Kralik, William E Whitehead, Thierry A G M Huisman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Chile | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,288,874
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1,846
of 5,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,255
of 329,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#31
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.