You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Significance of the cribriform morphology area ratio for biochemical recurrence in Gleason score 4 + 4 prostate cancer patients following robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Medicine, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/cam4.7086 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenji Shimodaira, Rie Inoue, Takeshi Hashimoto, Naoya Satake, Toshihide Shishido, Kazunori Namiki, Kazuharu Harada, Toshitaka Nagao, Yoshio Ohno |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#809,231
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Medicine
#65
of 3,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,670
of 169,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Medicine
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.