You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fine tuning of CpG spatial distribution with DNA origami for improved cancer vaccination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Nanotechnology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41565-024-01615-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yang C. Zeng, Olivia J. Young, Christopher M. Wintersinger, Frances M. Anastassacos, James I. MacDonald, Giorgia Isinelli, Maxence O. Dellacherie, Miguel Sobral, Haiqing Bai, Amanda R. Graveline, Andyna Vernet, Melinda Sanchez, Kathleen Mulligan, Youngjin Choi, Thomas C. Ferrante, Derin B. Keskin, Geoffrey G. Fell, Donna Neuberg, Catherine J. Wu, David J. Mooney, Ick Chan Kwon, Ju Hee Ryu, William M. Shih |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 21% |
| Germany | 3 | 9% |
| India | 3 | 9% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 61% |
| Scientists | 9 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 6 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#372,167
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Nature Nanotechnology
#330
of 3,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,605
of 292,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Nanotechnology
#4
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.