You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementing governmental oversight of enhanced potential pandemic pathogen research.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Virology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1128/jvi.00237-24 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard H Ebright, Raina MacIntyre, Joseph P Dudley, Colin D Butler, Andre Goffinet, Edward Hammond, Elisa D Harris, Hideki Kakeya, Yanna Lambrinidou, Milton Leitenberg, Stuart A Newman, Bryce E Nickels, Monali C Rahalkar, Matt W Ridley, Steven L Salzberg, Harish Seshadri, Günter Theißen, Antonius M VanDongen, Alex Washburne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 14 | 27% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 98% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,085,209
of 25,846,867 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Virology
#470
of 25,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,967
of 329,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Virology
#1
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,846,867 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.