You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A rapid environmental risk assessment of the Kakhovka Dam breach during the Ukraine conflict
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41559-024-02373-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bryan M. Spears, Quillon Harpham, Emma Brown, Catherine L. Barnett, Louise Barwell, Marta Roca Collell, Mark Davison, Harry Dixon, J. Alex Elliott, Angus Garbutt, Caroline Hazlewood, Barbara Hofmann, James Lanyon, Stephen Lofts, Colin MacKechnie, Sergiy Medinets, James Noble, David Ramsbottom, John W. Redhead, Alberto Riera, David J. Spurgeon, Claus Svendsen, Philip Taylor, Stephen J. Thackeray, Katharine Turvey, Michael D. Wood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 44% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Ukraine | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
Scientists | 6 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#603,768
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#982
of 2,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,621
of 288,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#22
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 149.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.