You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biomedical Engineering, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41551-024-01185-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhicheng Lin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 30 | 32% |
| China | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 56 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 81 | 86% |
| Scientists | 8 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#712,485
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biomedical Engineering
#408
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,137
of 264,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biomedical Engineering
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.