You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum to “Scaling Indigenous-led natural resource management” [Glob. Environ. Chang. 84 (2024) 102799]
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102824 |
| Authors |
Arundhati Jagadish, Anna Freni-Sterrantino, Yifan He, Tanya O' Garra, Lisa Gecchele, Sangeeta Mangubhai, Hugh Govan, Alifereti Tawake, Margaret Tabunakawai Vakalalabure, Michael B. Mascia, Morena Mills |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,376,077
of 25,545,162 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#525
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#843
of 20,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,545,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them