↓ Skip to main content

Neuromuscular Control and Resistance Training for People With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neuromuscular Control and Resistance Training for People With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, May 2024
DOI 10.2519/jospt.2024.12349
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if adding lumbar neuromuscular control retraining exercises to a 12-week program of strengthening exercises has greater effect for improving disability than 12 weeks of strengthening exercises alone in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Single centre, participant and assessor-blinded, comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial. METHODS: 69 participants (31 females; 29 males; mean age 46.5 years) with non-specific chronic LBP were recruited for a twelve-week program involving lumbar extension neuromuscular retraining in addition to resistance exercises (intervention) or 12 weeks of resistance exercises alone (control). The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcome measures included the Numeric Rating Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-three participants (22 control; 21 intervention) completed all outcome measures at 6 and 12 weeks. Fourteen participants were lost to follow-up and 12 participants discontinued due to COVID-19 restrictions. Both groups demonstrated clinically important changes in disability, pain intensity and kinesiophobia. The difference between groups with respect to disability was imprecise and not clinically meaningful (mean difference, -4.4, 95% CI [-10.2, 1.4]) at 12 weeks. Differences in secondary outcomes at 6 or 12 weeks were also small with wide confidence intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Adding lumbar neuromuscular control retraining to a series of resistance exercises offered no additional benefit over resistance exercises alone over a 12-week period.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Researcher 4 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 66 64%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Unspecified 9 9%
Sports and Recreations 7 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 68 66%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,966,754
of 34,388,610 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#653
of 2,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,542
of 376,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,388,610 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.