↓ Skip to main content

Probiotics in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review of clinical studies and future directions

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Reviews, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
174 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probiotics in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review of clinical studies and future directions
Published in
Nutrition Reviews, March 2024
DOI 10.1093/nutrit/nuae010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olga Barba-Vila, Helena García-Mieres, Belén Ramos

Abstract

It is hypothesized that gut dysbiosis, a typical feature of patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), could be involved in the origin of this neurodevelopmental disorder. Therefore, the use of probiotics to restore gastrointestinal (GI) equilibrium might be a promising therapeutic strategy due to its capacity to balance the gut-brain axis and behavioral responses. To summarize current knowledge on the use of probiotics to treat core clinical ASD symptoms and concomitant GI signs, compare the design of published studies with those of ongoing trials, assess the near future of this field, and provide recommendations for improving novel studies. The literature search was conducted in February 2020 and updated in March 2021, using a broad range of bibliographic and clinical trial-specific databases. Data were extracted using a standardized form, and articles reporting on 28 clinical studies (already published or still ongoing) were included. The risk of bias in clinical studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Assessment tool for randomized trials and the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies-Interventions tool for nonrandomized trials. The results suggest that probiotics improve ASD-like social deficits, GI symptoms, and gut microbiota profile. However, inconsistencies among studies and their methodological limitations make it difficult to draw any conclusions regarding the efficacy of probiotics in ASD. This review provides specific suggestions for future research to improve the quality of the studies. Although ongoing studies have improved designs, the available knowledge does not permit solid conclusions to be made regarding the efficacy of probiotics in ameliorating the symptoms (psychiatric and/or GI) associated with ASD. Thus, more high-quality research and new approaches are needed to design effective probiotic strategies for ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 174 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#311,018
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Reviews
#102
of 2,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,799
of 294,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Reviews
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.