You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Multicenter integrated analysis of noncoding CRISPRi screens
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Methods, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41592-024-02216-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Yao, Josh Tycko, Jin Woo Oh, Lexi R. Bounds, Sager J. Gosai, Lazaros Lataniotis, Ava Mackay-Smith, Benjamin R. Doughty, Idan Gabdank, Henri Schmidt, Tania Guerrero-Altamirano, Keith Siklenka, Katherine Guo, Alexander D. White, Ingrid Youngworth, Kalina Andreeva, Xingjie Ren, Alejandro Barrera, Yunhai Luo, Galip Gürkan Yardımcı, Ryan Tewhey, Anshul Kundaje, William J. Greenleaf, Pardis C. Sabeti, Christina Leslie, Yuri Pritykin, Jill E. Moore, Michael A. Beer, Charles A. Gersbach, Timothy E. Reddy, Yin Shen, Jesse M. Engreitz, Michael C. Bassik, Steven K. Reilly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 59 | 43% |
Japan | 7 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
Germany | 4 | 3% |
China | 3 | 2% |
Australia | 3 | 2% |
Italy | 2 | 1% |
Poland | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | 4% |
Unknown | 47 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 84 | 61% |
Members of the public | 51 | 37% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#319,686
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#337
of 5,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,689
of 280,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#6
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.