↓ Skip to main content

Reserve Size, Conspecific Density, and Translocation Success for Black Rhinoceros

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reserve Size, Conspecific Density, and Translocation Success for Black Rhinoceros
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, December 2010
DOI 10.2193/2007-398
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 130 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 21%
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 37%
Environmental Science 35 27%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 30 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,582,289
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#922
of 4,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,344
of 254,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#124
of 567 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 567 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.