You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
User-Generated Content Shapes Judicial Reasoning: Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial on Wikipedia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Information Systems Research, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1287/isre.2023.0034 |
| Authors |
Neil C. Thompson, Xueyun Luo, Brian McKenzie, Edana Richardson, Brian Flanagan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 20% |
| Argentina | 3 | 6% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 82% |
| Scientists | 7 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,203,661
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Information Systems Research
#51
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,094
of 288,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Information Systems Research
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.