You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing future potentiality of technologies from the perspective of “imaginary future generations” – A case study of hydrothermal technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123289 |
| Authors |
Keishiro Hara, Iori Miura, Masanori Suzuki, Toshihiro Tanaka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,045,807
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Technological Forecasting and Social Change
#69
of 2,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,033
of 31,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Technological Forecasting and Social Change
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.