↓ Skip to main content

Modelling the economic constraints and consequences of Anaesthesia Associate expansion in the UK National Health Service. Response by the Association of Anaesthetists SAS Committee to Br J Anaesth…

Overview of attention for article published in BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
162 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modelling the economic constraints and consequences of Anaesthesia Associate expansion in the UK National Health Service. Response by the Association of Anaesthetists SAS Committee to Br J Anaesth 2024; 132: 867–76
Published in
BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, March 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.bja.2024.02.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J Fleming, Emma C E Wain

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 162 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#390,963
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#67
of 6,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,891
of 292,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#4
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.