↓ Skip to main content

朝鮮の開化期教育思想と日本との関わり : 兪吉濬の開化思想と甲午改革を中心として

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
朝鮮の開化期教育思想と日本との関わり : 兪吉濬の開化思想と甲午改革を中心として
Published in
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, January 2017
DOI 10.20554/nihondaigakukyouikugakkai.23.0_82
Authors

文 洪植

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
#30
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,910
of 423,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.