↓ Skip to main content

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Substance Abuse Treatment Initiation and Engagement

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Substance Abuse Treatment Initiation and Engagement
Published in
Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, March 2012
DOI 10.1080/15332640.2012.652516
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study examined variations by race and ethnicity in initiation and engagement, two performance measures of treatment for substance use disorders that focus on the timely receipt of services during the early stage of substance abuse treatment. Administrative data from the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services were linked with facility-level information from the National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services. We found that Black clients were least likely to initiate treatment, but no race or ethnic differences in treatment engagement were found when compared by race or ethnicity. Most client and facility characteristics' association with initiation or engagement did not differ across racial or ethnic groups. Increased attention is needed to understand what may contribute to the differences and how to address them. This study also offers an approach that state agencies may implement for monitoring treatment quality and examining racial and ethnic disparities in substance abuse treatment services.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 24%
Social Sciences 14 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 27 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,295,594
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse
#69
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,129
of 170,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.