You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Orbital/ocular inflammatory involvement in VEXAS syndrome: Data from the international AIDA network VEXAS registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152430 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio Vitale, Valeria Caggiano, Eduardo Martin-Nares, Micol Frassi, Lorenzo Dagna, Pravin Hissaria, Paolo Sfriso, José Hernández-Rodríguez, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza, Sara Monti, Abdurrahman Tufan, Matteo Piga, Henrique A Mayrink Giardini, Giuseppe Lopalco, Ombretta Viapiana, Amato De Paulis, Paola Triggianese, Rosetta Vitetta, Alejandra de-la-Torre, Alex Fonollosa, Federico Caroni, Jurgen Sota, Edoardo Conticini, Jessica Sbalchiero, Alessandra Renieri, Giulia Casamassima, Ewa Wiesik-Szewczyk, Derya Yildirim, Andrea Hinojosa-Azaola, Francesca Crisafulli, Franco Franceschini, Corrado Campochiaro, Alessandro Tomelleri, Alicia Callisto, Mark Beecher, Sara Bindoli, Chiara Baggio, Verónica Gómez-Caverzaschi, Laura Pelegrín, Adriana Soto-Peleteiro, Alessandra Milanesi, Ibrahim Vasi, Alberto Cauli, Isabele Parente de Brito Antonelli, Florenzo Iannone, Riccardo Bixio, Francesca Della Casa, Ilaria Mormile, Carmelo Gurnari, Alessia Fiorenza, Germán Mejia-Salgado, Perla Ayumi Kawakami-Campos, Gaafar Ragab, Francesco Ciccia, Piero Ruscitti, Monica Bocchia, Alberto Balistreri, Gian Marco Tosi, Bruno Frediani, Luca Cantarini, Claudia Fabiani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 36% |
| France | 3 | 11% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| Mexico | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,273,357
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism
#205
of 1,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,592
of 296,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.