↓ Skip to main content

A multicolor suite for deciphering population coding of calcium and cAMP in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
90 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A multicolor suite for deciphering population coding of calcium and cAMP in vivo
Published in
Nature Methods, March 2024
DOI 10.1038/s41592-024-02222-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatsushi Yokoyama, Satoshi Manita, Hiroyuki Uwamori, Mio Tajiri, Itaru Imayoshi, Sho Yagishita, Masanori Murayama, Kazuo Kitamura, Masayuki Sakamoto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#865,046
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,130
of 5,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,912
of 284,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#31
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.