You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phytochemical, Nutritional and Mineral Content of Four Edible Flowers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Foods, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3390/foods13060939 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilaria Marchioni, Morena Gabriele, Giulia Carmassi, Barbara Ruffoni, Luisa Pistelli, Laura Pistelli, Basma Najar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,169,832
of 25,551,063 outputs
Outputs from Foods
#236
of 5,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,142
of 166,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Foods
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,551,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.