↓ Skip to main content

The Forces Associated with Bolus Injection and Continuous Infusion Techniques during Ultrasound-Targeted Nerve Contact: An Ex Vivo Study

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Sciences, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Forces Associated with Bolus Injection and Continuous Infusion Techniques during Ultrasound-Targeted Nerve Contact: An Ex Vivo Study
Published in
Applied Sciences, March 2024
DOI 10.3390/app14072673
Authors

Ashraf Agweder, Youheng Zeng, Jiatao Liu, Graeme McLeod, Zhihong Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,351,446
of 25,546,214 outputs
Outputs from Applied Sciences
#949
of 14,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,998
of 158,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Sciences
#12
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,546,214 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,940 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.