You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Classification of early tuberculosis states to guide research for improved care and prevention: an international Delphi consensus exercise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00028-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna K Coussens, Syed M A Zaidi, Brian W Allwood, Puneet K Dewan, Glenda Gray, Mikashmi Kohli, Tamara Kredo, Ben J Marais, Guy B Marks, Leo Martinez, Morten Ruhwald, Thomas J Scriba, James A Seddon, Phumeza Tisile, Digby F Warner, Robert J Wilkinson, Hanif Esmail, Rein M G J Houben, International Consensus for Early TB group, David Alland, Marcel A Behr, Busisiwe B Beko, Erlina Burhan, Gavin Churchyard, Frank Cobelens, Justin T Denholm, Ryan Dinkele, Jerrold J Ellner, Razia Fatima, Kate A Haigh, Mark Hatherill, Katherine C Horton, Emily A Kendall, Palwasha Y Khan, Peter MacPherson, Stephanus T Malherbe, Vidya Mave, Simon C Mendelsohn, Munyaradzi Musvosvi, Elisa Nemes, Adam Penn-Nicholson, Dharanidharan Ramamurthy, Molebogeng X Rangaka, Suvanand Sahu, Alvaro Schwalb, Divya K Shah, Dylan Sheerin, Donald Simon, Adrie J C Steyn, Nguyen Thu Anh, Gerhard Walzl, Charlotte L Weller, Caroline ML Williams, Emily B Wong, Robin Wood, Yingda L Xie, Siyan Yi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 11 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 10% |
| India | 8 | 10% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 60% |
| Scientists | 20 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 55% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 27% |
| Researcher | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 55% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 27% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 9% |
| Engineering | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 172. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#240,477
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#230
of 2,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,460
of 259,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 79.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.