You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Height growth and biomass partitioning during secondary succession differ among forest light strata and successional guilds in a tropical rainforest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oikos, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/oik.10486 |
| Authors |
Tomonari Matsuo, Frans Bongers, Miguel Martínez‐Ramos, Masha T. van der Sande, Lourens Poorter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Mexico | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 23% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 58% |
| Scientists | 23 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 50% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 50% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,159,168
of 25,579,912 outputs
Outputs from Oikos
#114
of 3,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,251
of 227,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oikos
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,579,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.