You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
International consensus is needed on a core outcome set to advance the evidence of best practice in cancer prehabilitation services and research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.bja.2024.02.021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna M Myers, Rachael C Barlow, Gabriele Baldini, Anna M Campbell, Franco Carli, Esther J Carr, Tom Collyer, Gerard Danjoux, June F Davis, Linda Denehy, James Durrand, Chelsia Gillis, Diana M Greenfield, Stuart P Griffiths, Mike Grocott, Liam Humphreys, Sandy Jack, Carol Keen, Denny Z H Levett, Zoe Merchant, John Moore, Susan Moug, William Ricketts, Daniel Santa Mina, John M Saxton, Clare E Shaw, Garry A Tew, Michael Thelwell, Malcolm A West, Robert J Copeland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 29 | 50% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Croatia | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 34% |
| Scientists | 6 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,062,448
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#282
of 6,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,023
of 280,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#5
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.