You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
274 (PB-090) Poster Clinical performance and agreement with immunohistochemistry of RT-qPCR-based early breast cancer subtyping: the Mammamark experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Cancer (1965), March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113841 |
| Authors |
D. Tormen, M.R. Biasin, I.M. Montagner, V. Mourmouras, A. Scapinello, G. Mora, G. Sgarbossa, D. Napetti, S. Lonardi, S. Frezzini |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#264,258
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#32
of 6,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,625
of 257,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#1
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.