You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Machine translation as a form of feedback on L2 writing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1515/iral-2023-0223 |
| Authors |
Miyuki Sasaki, Atsushi Mizumoto, Paul Kei Matsuda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 24% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Egypt | 1 | 5% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Scientists | 7 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,860,012
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL)
#7
of 146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,155
of 247,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL)
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.