You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Supervision of SAS anaesthetists who are not formally recognised as autonomous. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2024; 132: 867–76
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.bja.2024.02.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Donald, Ashwini Keshkamat, Sunil Kumar, Kirstin May, Lucy Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 57% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Uganda | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,429,204
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#1,056
of 6,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,567
of 271,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#18
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.