You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unintended consequences of planting native and non‐native trees in treeless ecosystems to mitigate climate change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ecology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2745.14300 |
| Authors |
Jaime Moyano, Romina D. Dimarco, Juan Paritsis, Tess Peterson, Duane A. Peltzer, Kerri M. Crawford, Matthew A. McCary, Kimberley T. Davis, Aníbal Pauchard, Martin A. Nuñez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 8% |
| Argentina | 5 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| South Africa | 3 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 24% |
| Unknown | 51 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 61 | 49% |
| Scientists | 52 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 42% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 25% |
| Professor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#475,358
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ecology
#54
of 3,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,216
of 258,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ecology
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.