↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of apical periodontitis in patients with autoimmune liver diseases under immune suppressants and immune modulators: a cross-sectional study.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Endodontics, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of apical periodontitis in patients with autoimmune liver diseases under immune suppressants and immune modulators: a cross-sectional study.
Published in
Journal of Endodontics, March 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.joen.2024.02.026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Ideo, Sadia Niazi, Luchino Chessa, Michela Miglianti, Giulia Bardini, Francesco Mannocci, Elisabetta Cotti

Abstract

Autoimmune liver diseases (ALDs) are chronic conditions generated by an immune-mediated auto-aggressive inflammatory reaction in genetically susceptible individuals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of AP in patients suffering from ALDs, in treatment with the immune-suppressants glucocorticoids, azathioprine, and/or ursodeoxycholic acid. The ALDs group included 46 patients (11 men and 35 women, average age: 57.9 ± 11.8 years) and 1186 teeth. The control (C) included 50 healthy patients (15 men and 35 women, average age: 58.6 ± 10.4 years) and 1251 teeth), under no medications. Demographic data, and medical, pharmacological, and dental history, were recorded. Dental and radiographic examinations were performed, presence of AP, periapical index score, DMFT, quality of restoration, and root canal treatment were evaluated. The influence of the medications assumed by the patients on the prevalence of AP was also tested. The prevalence of AP was significantly lower in ALDs than in C, at patient (p=.019), and tooth level (p=.005). (p=.015). Smoking and age were associated with a significant increase in AP in cases and controls (p=0.045, and p=0.001). In both groups, endodontically treated teeth showed a higher prevalence of AP. considering all the limitation due to the observational nature of the study, the patients affected by autoimmune liver diseases, and in treatment with immune-suppressors (often associated with immune-modulators), were found to exhibit lower prevalence of AP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,410,260
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Endodontics
#164
of 2,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,325
of 267,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Endodontics
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.