You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Primary mismatch repair–deficient prostate cancer can be identified prospectively in prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virchows Archiv, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00428-024-03789-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andres M. Acosta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,823,619
of 25,601,426 outputs
Outputs from Virchows Archiv
#96
of 2,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,364
of 169,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virchows Archiv
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,601,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.