↓ Skip to main content

Wearing face masks as a potential source for inhalation and oral uptake of inanimate toxins – A scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 9,024)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1089 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wearing face masks as a potential source for inhalation and oral uptake of inanimate toxins – A scoping review
Published in
Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety, March 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115858
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai Kisielinski, Stefan Hockertz, Oliver Hirsch, Stephan Korupp, Bernd Klosterhalfen, Andreas Schnepf, Gerald Dyker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,089 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 714. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#29,216
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety
#4
of 9,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#376
of 275,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety
#1
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,024 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.