↓ Skip to main content

Best possible upper bounds on the restrained domination number of cubic graphs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Graph Theory, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Best possible upper bounds on the restrained domination number of cubic graphs
Published in
Journal of Graph Theory, April 2024
DOI 10.1002/jgt.23095
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,931,618
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Graph Theory
#278
of 405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,873
of 167,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Graph Theory
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 405 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.