You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Raw-material exploitation in the Earlier and Middle Stone Age in the Eastern Desert of Egypt: evidence from Wadi Abu Subeira
|
---|---|
Published in |
Antiquity, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.15184/aqy.2024.40 |
Authors |
Alice Leplongeon, Maxence Bailly, Gwenola Graff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 5 | 11% |
Spain | 4 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
Japan | 2 | 4% |
India | 2 | 4% |
Germany | 2 | 4% |
United States | 2 | 4% |
Israel | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 19 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 71% |
Scientists | 13 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 269. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#136,982
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Antiquity
#114
of 3,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,451
of 269,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antiquity
#6
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.