| Title |
Depression follow-up monitoring with the PHQ-9: open cluster-randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0539 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tony Kendrick, Christopher Dowrick, Glyn Lewis, Michael Moore, Geraldine Leydon, Adam W A Geraghty, Gareth Griffiths, Shihua Zhu, Guiqing Yao, Carl May, Mark Gabbay, Rachel Dewar-Haggart, Samantha Williams, Lien Bui, Natalie Thompson, Lauren Bridewell, Emilia Trapasso, Tasneem Patel, Molly McCarthy, Naila Khan, Helen Page, Emma Corcoran, Jane Sungmin Hahn, Molly Bird, Mekeda X Logan, Brian Chi Fung Ching, Riya Tiwari, Anna Hunt, Beth Stuart |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#772,445
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#329
of 4,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,035
of 270,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.