You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation of Thermal Imaging and the ALT-70 Prediction Model to Differentiate Cellulitis From Pseudocellulitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Dermatology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.0091 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael S. Pulia, Rebecca J. Schwei, Roxana Alexandridis, Michael R. Lasarev, Edward Harwick, Robert Glinert, Ambar Haleem, Jamie Hess, Thomas D. Keenan, Joseph A. McBride, Robert Redwood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 19% |
| Colombia | 2 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 19% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 1% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 97% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 97% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,100,310
of 25,994,718 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Dermatology
#800
of 6,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,962
of 193,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Dermatology
#21
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,994,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.