You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Children's experiences of mask‐wearing: a systemic review and narrative synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jep.13982 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elin Preest, Trisha Greenhalgh, Christian Farrier, Helene‐Mari van der Westhuizen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 245 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 24 | 10% |
| Canada | 19 | 8% |
| Germany | 19 | 8% |
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| Cameroon | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 138 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 212 | 87% |
| Scientists | 22 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 127. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#334,521
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
#16
of 1,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,730
of 268,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them