↓ Skip to main content

Essential blood testing in the patient using androgenic anabolic steroids: a clinical practice guideline for primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Essential blood testing in the patient using androgenic anabolic steroids: a clinical practice guideline for primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, March 2024
DOI 10.3399/bjgp24x737013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen M Gibbons, Mary Moulding, Keir Bailey, Kevin Stuart, Sid Wiffen, Andrew Jp Lewington, Richard Parker, Carys Lippiatt, Nishan Guha, Jamie O'Shea, Mary Owen, Afroze Abbas, Julian H Barth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#14,791,156
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,249
of 4,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,847
of 250,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#34
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.