You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mandating indoor air quality for public buildings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.adl0677 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lidia Morawska, Joseph Allen, William Bahnfleth, Belinda Bennett, Philomena M Bluyssen, Atze Boerstra, Giorgio Buonanno, Junji Cao, Stephanie J Dancer, Andres Floto, Francesco Franchimon, Trish Greenhalgh, Charles Haworth, Jaap Hogeling, Christina Isaxon, Jose L Jimenez, Amanda Kennedy, Prashant Kumar, Jarek Kurnitski, Yuguo Li, Marcel Loomans, Guy Marks, Linsey C Marr, Livio Mazzarella, Arsen Krikor Melikov, Shelly L Miller, Donald K Milton, Jason Monty, Peter V Nielsen, Catherine Noakes, Jordan Peccia, Kimberly A Prather, Xavier Querol, Tunga Salthammer, Chandra Sekhar, Olli Seppänen, Shin-Ichi Tanabe, Julian W Tang, Raymond Tellier, Kwok Wai Tham, Pawel Wargocki, Aneta Wierzbicka, Maosheng Yao |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,708 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 401 | 15% |
| Australia | 218 | 8% |
| Canada | 192 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 160 | 6% |
| Spain | 69 | 3% |
| Germany | 50 | 2% |
| France | 40 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 21 | <1% |
| Mexico | 17 | <1% |
| Other | 298 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1242 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2281 | 84% |
| Scientists | 220 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 144 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 62 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 8 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 7% |
| Energy | 4 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1723. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2026.
All research outputs
#7,278
of 34,452,566 outputs
Outputs from Science
#389
of 94,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145
of 380,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#5
of 436 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,452,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 436 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.