↓ Skip to main content

How can patients influence service improvement decision-making? a participatory research mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
How can patients influence service improvement decision-making? a participatory research mixed methods study
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2023
DOI 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Drinkwater, Anne MacFarlane, Maureen Twiddy, David Meads, Ruth H Chadwick, Ailsa Donnelly, Phil Gleeson, Nick Hayward, Michael Kelly, Robina Mir, Graham Prestwich, Martin Rathfelder, Robbie Foy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,615,617
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,211
of 4,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,502
of 357,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#25
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.