↓ Skip to main content

腸内細菌におけるβ-L-アラビノフラノシダーゼの役割

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Glycoscience and Glycotechnology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
腸内細菌におけるβ-L-アラビノフラノシダーゼの役割
Published in
Trends in Glycoscience and Glycotechnology, March 2024
DOI 10.4052/tigg.2306.1j
Authors

藤田 清貴, 石渡 明弘, 伏信 進矢

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,829,511
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Glycoscience and Glycotechnology
#125
of 155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,566
of 168,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Glycoscience and Glycotechnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 155 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them